Organizers: University of Bucharest – Faculty of History, Department of Ancient History, Archaeology and History of Art and International Society for Cultural History
November 27th-29th 2020
Accepted languages: English, French, Italian, Spanish.
Extended Deadline: September 25th 2020.
Abstracts: no more than 300 words to be submitted at the e-mail address email@example.com. The abstract should also contain the title of the presentation, the name of the author(s) and the home institution(s).
Duration of each presentation: 20 minutes followed by 10 minutes for discussions.
Announcement of accepted proposals: September 30th 2020.
Objets en dialogue.
Présences matérielles, littéraires et iconogra-phiques des objets dans
l’univers humain pendant l’Antiquité et au Moyen Âge
Université de Bucarest – Faculté d’Histoire, Département d’Histoire Ancienne, Archéologie et Histoire de l’Art et Internationa Society for Cultural History, 27-29 novembre 2020.
Langues de communication : Anglais, Français, Italien, Espagnol.
Date limite d’envoi des propositions : 25 septembre 2020.
Propositions de communication: on attend des propositions d’environ 300 mots à l’adresse mail firstname.lastname@example.org. De plus, les propositions vont clairement indiquer le titre de la communication, le nom des auteurs et les institutions de rattachement.
Digital poster section: a poster gallery will also be available for researchers preferring to send their presentation in this form. The gallery will be open to the public for the whole duration of the conference. On demand, the posters may be accompanied by a recorded audio presentation, no more than 10 minutes in length.
Technical details will be available shortly, on the dedicated page at http://www.daaia.ro/.
Host institution: University of Bucharest (online).
Deadline for papers to be published in a collective volume: January 15th 2021.
Organizers and contact: Ecaterina Lung (University of Bucharest), Alexandra Liţu (University of Bucharest), Alexandra Ţârlea (University of Bucharest) at email@example.com
Material culture occupies a special place in most research conducted on Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Interdisciplinary approaches have allowed for the enrichment of traditional paradigms used by archaeologists and historians, as a follow-up to the valorization of the social life of things, or of the agency characterizing objects in any
given society. Objects which are deliberately associated are more susceptible of becoming expressive in the presence of humans. From this perspective, associating objects, and exploring potential reasons for their association and for their compatibility, opens up multiple possibilities for reflection.
Here are some suggested topics, meant to inspire, without limiting, the participants’ choice of subject matter:
- the place of associated objects in literary sources. Suggested lines of
investigation: the place of associated objects in literary discourses, their role in the construction of characters or as vehicles used to advance the action, to create images or to emphasize key moments in the economy of the texts; the practices of writing about objects, ways of selecting and including them in texts, and the study of certain characteristics of objects judged as indispensable to the fulfillment of said objects’ narrative roles.
- the place of associated objects in constructing images, be they objects carrying images or objects being represented. Suggested lines of investigation: the manners of representing objects, the objects’ insertion in representations and their contributions to visually illustrated discourses.
- the intrinsic materiality of objects places the discussion in the field of
archaeology. From this perspective and for the purpose of a better
investigation of associated objects and their potential meanings, one (though by no means the only) possible line of enquiry would turn the researcher’s gaze towards funerary archaeology.
Beyond these suggestions, the synchronic and comparative approaches to various media where objects are placed in association (texts, materiality, images) are strongly encouraged, in order to better assess multiple perspectives and perceptions to which the objects could be subjected, as well as the ways in which objects, once put together in particular and deliberate ways, acquire the capacity of
acting as agents.